Lala Kent, a prominent figure in the reality TV show Vanderpump Rules, recently took to Amazon Live to clarify her stance on her co-star Raquel Leviss’ actions. The issue at hand revolves around Leviss’ decision to block another co-star, Tom Sandoval, on social media and publicly announce it. This analysis aims to dissect the various facets of Kent’s annoyance with Leviss, the implications for the show, and the broader context of public figures managing personal issues in the public eye.
Kent’s primary grievance is not with Leviss’ decision to block Sandoval; rather, it is with the public manner in which Leviss chose to announce this action. Kent argues that Leviss’ public announcement contradicts her stated desire to distance herself from the drama surrounding the show. Kent expressed her annoyance by stating, “You’ve made it known that you want to remove yourself from this world and then you post it on social media to 600 plus thousand people.”
Kent offered specific advice to Leviss, suggesting that if she truly wants to distance herself from the show’s drama, she should do so quietly. Alternatively, Leviss should openly admit that she still seeks attention, which is why she chose to block Sandoval publicly. Kent’s advice encapsulates her belief that actions should align with stated intentions, especially when those actions are made public.
Kent herself faced public backlash for calling out Leviss, particularly given the latter’s recent mental health struggles and her decision to check into a treatment facility. The situation is further complicated by the fact that Leviss and Sandoval were previously involved in an affair, which led to Sandoval’s breakup with his long-term girlfriend, Ariana Madix.
Kent’s annoyance also brings into focus the role of social media in the lives of public figures. Leviss’ decision to publicly announce her actions on a platform followed by hundreds of thousands of people raises questions about the boundaries between personal life and public persona. Kent criticizes Leviss for not facing her issues in person and resorting to social media, labeling her a “coward.”
Tom Sandoval, the other party involved, also expressed his discontent with Leviss’ public announcement. He termed her actions as “childish” and “immature,” questioning the need for such a public display when she is supposedly working on herself.
This is not the first time that Kent and Leviss have been at odds. Their relationship has seen several ups and downs, often played out in the public eye. The current situation adds another layer to their complex relationship, especially considering Leviss’ recent mental health struggles and her decision to not return for the show’s 11th season.
The ongoing drama between Kent, Leviss, and Sandoval has implications for Vanderpump Rules, a show that thrives on interpersonal relationships and conflicts. With Leviss opting out of the upcoming season and Kent publicly expressing her annoyance, the dynamics of the show are bound to be affected.
Lala Kent’s public expression of annoyance with Raquel Leviss serves as a case study in the complexities of managing personal issues in the public eye, especially for reality TV stars. While Kent’s annoyance stems from what she perceives as Leviss’ contradictory actions, the situation is complicated by Leviss’ recent mental health struggles, her history with Sandoval, and the implications for Vanderpump Rules. As public figures continue to navigate the blurred lines between their personal and public lives, such instances serve as cautionary tales in the age of social media.